Gisbert Cuper - Johann Georg Graevius - 1699-1-1
From Fina Wiki
Gisbert Cuper
Gisbert Cuper - Johann Georg Graevius - 1699-1-1
| FINA IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ | 3663 |
| InstitutionName of Institution. | Oxford, Bodleian Library |
| InventoryInventory number. | MS D’Orville 478, f° 146-147 |
| AuthorAuthor of the document. | Gisbert Cuper |
| RecipientRecipient of the correspondence. | Johann Georg Graevius |
| Correspondence dateDate when the correspondence was written: day - month - year . | January 1, 1699 |
| PlacePlace of publication of the book, composition of the document or institution. | |
| Associated personsNames of Persons who are mentioned in the annotation. | Jean Foy-Vaillant |
| LiteratureReference to literature. | |
| KeywordNumismatic Keywords ᵖ | Language |
| LanguageLanguage of the correspondence | Latin |
| External LinkLink to external information, e.g. Wikpedia ᵖ | http://emlo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/profile/work/de8e90f3-163d-4cee-9ac4-807cf5e5fd33?sort=date-a&rows=50&let con=He has written these two letters to Vaillant&baseurl=/forms/advanced&start=0&type=advanced&numFound=1 |
Map
You can move or zoom the map to explore other correspondence!
Grand documentOriginal passage from the "Grand document".
-Lettre du 1 janvier 1699 (sans lieu): He has written these two letters to Vaillant and $word$, chiefly about ancient coins, in French because it comes more easily to them than Latin and is therefore a more likely vehicle for a correspondence. I have left it open so that you may give your opinion on the points raised. I am glad you approve «Divine» or «Sulphur», for if that ring is to be accounted a magic ring you rightly judge that «Sulphur» is appropriate seeing that sulphur was used for averting enchantment. (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS D’Orville 478, f° 146-147).
