Elstob, William - An account of ye examination that was made of the several Roman weights that are to be met wthin the Cabinets belonging to ye Bodleian Library Among Archbishop Lauds Roman Families
William Elstob, Oxford, 1700/12/23
Elstob, William - An account of ye examination that was made of the several Roman weights that are to be met wthin the Cabinets belonging to ye Bodleian Library Among Archbishop Lauds Roman Families
| FINA IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ | 14991 |
| TitleTitel of the book. | An account of ye examination that was made of the several Roman weights that are to be met wthin the Cabinets belonging to ye Bodleian Library Among Archbishop Lauds Roman Families |
| InstitutionName of Institution. | Oxford, Ashmolean Museum |
| PlacePlace of publication of the book, composition of the document or institution. | Oxford 51° 45' 7.25" N, 1° 15' 28.26" W |
| InventoryInventory number. | MS Arch. Bod. Fol 4 (= MS Rawlinson N1) |
| AuthorAuthor of the document. (Collector) | William Elstob |
| Catalogue dateDate when the catalogue was issued: day - month - year . | December 23, 1700 |
| LanguageLanguage of the correspondence | English |
| Associated personsNames of Persons who are mentioned in the annotation. | Humfrey Wanley, William Laud |
| LiteratureReference to literature. | Berry - Kim 2005, p. 135Berry - Kim 2005, Burnett 2020b, pp. 429-30, 1248Burnett 2020b |
| External LinkLink to external information, e.g. Wikpedia ᵖ | |
| KeywordNumismatic Keywords ᵖ | Roman , Roman Republican , Aes Grave |
Grand documentOriginal passage from the "Grand document".
'Wanley reported in 1700 that Elstob had been weighing and describing ‘the old Roman weights,’ the large Roman bronze pieces which we now recognise as the heavy cast bronze pieces of aes grave, made in the third century BC. The list has survived, and is entitled ‘An account of ye examination that was made of the several Roman weights that are to be met wthin the Cabinets belonging to ye Bodleian Library Among Archbishop Lauds Roman Families.’ At the end of the list, it is stated that ‘This examination was made December 23rd 1700 by ...’ and then signed in a different hand and ink ‘Humfrey Wanley.’ Berry and Kim acutely observed that it had previously been signed by William Elstob, to whom Wanley had entrusted the work, but whom he had deprived of the credit by erasing his name.' (Burnett 2020b, p. 1248)
